Is online education good for learning?

Is online education good for learning? Nearly twenty five years ago, this was a relevant and pressing question for the education sector, universities in particular. Back then I was working at Monash University under the grand title of Associate Professor in Flexible Learning (flexible learning being the popular catchphrase at the time). I’d been working closely with my friend and colleague Len Webster at the time, and we’d been heavily involved in the development of online learning, going so far as designing and developing our own software (InterLearn) for the presentation of our post-graduate flexible learning course for academic staff.

Following the stunning success of the Monash student debating team (world champions, no less), we had the bright idea of organising a debate on the efficacy of online learning, involving both staff and student speakers. The title was a bit clumsy (‘Online Education: Good for Learning or Good for Nothing’), which is why I started this post with a shortened and neater form of the question to be debated. Anyway, we pressed on, and were able to recruit six unsuspecting debaters; two Monash staff, two staff from other universities, and two Monash students.

Unsure whether we’d attract a crowd, we set the time for early evening when lectures were by and large finished, and added the attraction of wine and cheese for starters (thanks for the support and funding, Graham Webb!). Another (hopeful) attraction was the presence of the Senior Deputy Vice-Chancellor, who committed to proving a brief summary at the conclusion. A particular technological innovation was the ‘Clapometer’, a cunning device developed by Len to measure the volume of applause for each team (and thus determine the winner of the debate).

Now why I’m telling you all this is that I recently discovered a VHS copy of the debate in a box of junk in the garage. There’s a great little local firm (Qantem) that converts videos to digital format, and as usual they did an excellent job. Encouragingly, one of them commented how much she’d enjoyed watching sections of it as it was being converted.

Anyway, the entire proceedings are herewith presented, all one hour and ten minutes of it. In the list of debaters below, I’ve indicated at which time(s) they speak.

  1. Kim Little (6:00 and 54:15)
  2. Cathy Rossouw (13:30 and 58:30)
  3. Prof. Peter Ling (21:30)
  4. Prof. Lorraine Ling (30:10)
  5. Prof. Dick Gunstone (39:00)
  6. Dr Kumar Amarasekara (47:35)
  7. Summary: Prof. Alan Lindsay (1:04:00)

If you care to view the video, you’ll find plenty of wit and wisdom from the protagonists. The ‘Yes’ case deplores the traditional Ivory Tower image of universities and pushes the notion of increased access, while the ‘No’ case highlights the new and emerging dangers of the emerging technological revolution. I can’t fail to mention a particular highlight, though, as one of the debaters bursts into song at about 36:30 minutes – see for yourself!

Now of course, at the time of the debate, the academics were well-established in their careers, but what of the two students? What happened to these world champion debaters? A quick check has established that both have moved on to highly successful careers. Kim Little works in early childhood education, most recently being lured from Victoria to South Australia where she will lead the rollout of universal three-year-old kindergarten.  Cathy Rossouw departed the shores of Australia some time ago to make her way in the wide world, now residing in New York and working as a partner at Chapman, a law firm focused on finance. It seems that if you want to make your way in the world, join the debating club!

All very good, but who won the debate? I won’t give it away. The Clapometer delivers the verdict.

 

Guest post*: Online learning issues we have yet to resolve

Online learning, or e-learning, is becoming an increasingly popular way to earn a degree.

The convenience of learning from one’s home computer, not to mention saving money on transportation, room and board, etc., is attracting an ever-larger number of students each year. Adult learners, who are often tied to familial and employment obligations, find this an excellent way to obtain a degree. Continue reading

Guest post*: How to stay focused when working online

Independent learning is a challenging task. You don’t have the physical presence of your peers, or your tutor present to answer questions and keep you focused. The motivation for study comes entirely from you, which can be tricky when your bed is just sooo cosy at 8am and you really don’t fancy dragging yourself to your desk to start the online tutorial. Even once you’ve made it to your computer, staying on task can be tricky, especially with the temptation of everything the internet holds. So, here are some handy tips to keep you focused when working independently online. Continue reading

“Online lectures suck.” But that’s not the problem.

“Online lectures suck”. Who said that, and why?

The comment was made by a Stanford student concerning his experience with the Coursera course CS229a: Applied Machine Learning. Ben Rudolph is an on-campus, fee-paying ($50,000 p.a.) student who took the online class as part of his studies. It’s thus not surprising that he wouldn’t be particularly enthralled by having to watch a series of short videos rather than attend lectures and mix with his peers. Continue reading

Online learning sites you haven’t heard of … maybe

Now here’s a catchy title: ’15 Free Learning Sites You Haven’t Heard of Yet’. Not only enticing, but also challenging – someone thinks they know something we don’t know. And we’re meant to be familiar online learning, so surely we’ve heard of most of them already?

That’s the way I felt anyway, as I satiated my curiosity by clicking the link provided by Sophia Coppolla from Onlinecollege.org in a recent email. How did I ‘score’? Two out of 15: Alison and University of the People, both good sites. Continue reading

Someone please have a word with Sebastian Thrun!

“I haven’t seen a single study showing that online learning is as good as other learning.” (Quote from ‘Universities reshaping education on the web‘ in The Age – original in The New York Times)  This knuckleheaded claim was apparently made (apologies if the quote was wrong) by a leader in the current wave of online learning technologies, one Sebastian Thrun of Stanford University. That it was made at all is surprising, but to have been uttered by ‘a master of MOOCs’ is astonishing. Continue reading

Guest post*: The ongoing global advance of online learning

Since the days of Europe’s first universities, higher education has tended to be elitist and exclusive. While there were always exceptions provided to the remarkably bright and talented, by and large universities educated the children of the wealthy. Continue reading